But I have to propose a potential alternative motive of this resulting issue.

It is my belief that the “party” was granted with the belief that the increased scrutiny that would inevitably arise would benefit the “host” and that China would liberalize – to an extent – as a result. Similar to your reference to the Spielberg example.

In fact, as we know, this is not how things worked out. Have you ever been invited to a “costume party” only to arrive and be the only goober to have worn an actual costume? This must be the way France, UK, and USA heads of state/ Olympic delegates must feel.

Just because we are the idiots in the costume does not mean, however, that we should bite our lips for being duped. On the contrary, we have another attempt, perhaps with even greater significance, to shed light on these grievances and bring awareness of them to a greater world stage.

In closing, I think it is also important to separate the politics from the sport. Olympic athletes have given a great personal sacrifice to represent their respective countries at these games. Political leaders should take note to honor and support these athletes (be them Chinese or otherwise) and relegate the boycotting fervor to the political arenas.

pax | lls